Tytanic v. Blue Sky Bio LLC et al
Filing
7
ORDER directing Defendant Blue Sky Bio, LLC to file an amended notice of removal to allege the existence of diversity jurisdiction within 14 days re 1 Notice of Removal,, filed by Blue Sky Bio LLC. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 9/29/2016. (mb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
CHRISTOPHER A. TYTANIC,
Plaintiff,
v.
BLUE SKY BIO, LLC, et al.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CIV-16-1107-D
ORDER
Upon review of the Notice of Removal, the Court finds insufficient allegations to
support the assertion of federal subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.1
Defendant Blue Sky Bio, LLC is a limited liability company. A limited liability company is
not treated like a corporation under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1), but like a limited partnership or
other unincorporated association under Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185 (1990). See
Siloam Springs Hotel, L.L.C. v. Century Surety Co., 781 F.3d 1233, 1237-38 (10th Cir.
2015). The Notice of Removal contains no information concerning the citizenship of the
members or owners of Blue Sky Bio, LLC and, therefore, fails to allege its citizenship.2
1
The Court has “an independent obligation to determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists”
and may raise the issue sua sponte at any time. 1mage Software, Inc. v. Reynolds & Reynolds Co., 459 F.3d
1044, 1048 (10th Cir. 2006); see Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514 (2006) (federal courts “have an
independent obligation to determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists, even in the absence of a
challenge from any party”).
2
In a motion filed in state court, Defendant Albert Zickmann states that the members of the Blue
Sky Bio, LLC include two trusts, but insufficient information is provided to determine the trusts’ citizenship.
See Conagra Foods, Inc. v. Americold Logistics, LLC, 776 F.3d 1175, 1181 (10th Cir. 2015), aff’d sub nom.
136 S. Ct. 1012 (2016).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Blue Sky Bio, LLC shall file an
amended notice of removal to allege the existence of diversity jurisdiction within 14 days
from the date of this Order.3
IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of September, 2016.
3
Defendant need not re-file the exhibits attached to the Notice of Removal but may incorporate them
by reference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(c).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?