Smith v. Drawbridge et al
Filing
12
ORDER REQUIRING SERVICE AND SPECIAL REPORT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B Goodwin on 11/15/2016. (jb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
FRED SMITH,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES DRAWBRIDGE et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CIV-16-1135-HE
ORDER REQUIRING SERVICE AND SPECIAL REPORT
Plaintiff Fred Smith, appearing pro se and proceeding in forma pauperis, has filed
this action claiming a violation of his federal civil rights. The Court has conducted a
preliminary review of the Complaint (Doc. No. 1) and finds that an investigation and
special report are necessary to develop a record sufficient to ascertain whether there are
any factual or legal bases for Plaintiff’s claims. See Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106,
1109 (10th Cir. 1991). In compliance with the guidelines set forth in Martinez v. Aaron,
570 F.2d 317 (10th Cir. 1978), IT IS THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that:
(1) Plaintiff shall cause a copy of this Order and of the Complaint, along with a
summons issued by the Court Clerk, to be served on each Defendant named in
the Complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(1). Service shall be accomplished as
follows:
(a) The Court Clerk is directed to mail to Plaintiff the necessary forms for
requesting the issuance of summonses along with this Order. For
service to be made, Plaintiff must complete these forms and return them
to the Court Clerk, along with sufficient copies of the Complaint to
effect service of process upon each Defendant, within twenty-one (21)
days from the date of this Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(b).
(b) Upon receipt of properly completed forms, the Court Clerk will issue
summonses. Because Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in
forma pauperis, the United States Marshals Service (“USMS”) shall be
authorized to attempt to serve each Defendant for whom Plaintiff
properly completes a request for the issuance of a summons. See Fed.
R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3).
(c) Despite the authorization of the USMS to attempt to accomplish service
as set forth in subparagraph (b), service is ultimately Plaintiff’s
responsibility. Each Defendant must be served within ninety (90) days
from the date of this Order. Unless service is waived, Plaintiff must
ensure that a proof of service is filed for each Defendant on or before
the expiration of this 90-day time period. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c), (d),
(l), (m). The failure to file timely proofs of service as to any Defendant
may result in the dismissal of the claims against that Defendant. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
(2) Officials responsible for the operation of James Crabtree Correctional Center
in Helena, Oklahoma, shall undertake a review of the subject matter of the
Complaint:
(a) to ascertain the facts and circumstances, including the outcome of
administrative relief sought by Plaintiff;
(b) to consider whether any action can and should be taken by the
institution or appropriate officials to resolve the subject matter of the
Complaint; and
(c) to determine whether prior related complaints, either in this Court or
elsewhere, (i) should be considered together with this Complaint, or (ii)
affect Plaintiff’s ability to proceed in forma pauperis in light of the
“three strikes” provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(g).
(3) Following completion of the review, a written special report setting forth the
findings shall be compiled. The special report shall restate in separate
paragraphs the allegations of the Complaint followed by the pertinent
information developed by the review. If appropriate, medical and psychiatric
records shall be included in the special report. Likewise, any rules and
regulations applicable to the claims and time frame of the Complaint shall be
included as part of the special report.
(4) The special report shall be filed no later than sixty (60) days from the date on
which the first Defendant is served. If a Defendant waives service, the date on
which the waiver form is sent shall be considered the date of service. See Fed.
R. Civ. P. 4(d)(4).
2
(5) Further, in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2) and Local Civil Rule
9.2(c), the Court orders each Defendant to file an answer or a dispositive
motion within sixty (60) days of service.
(6) If a motion to dismiss or other dispositive motion is filed, Plaintiff must file a
response within twenty-one (21) days from the date the motion was filed. See
LCvR 7.1(g). Failure to respond to the motion within that time period may
result in the motion being deemed confessed. Id.
(7) Unless otherwise ordered, any party shall have seven (7) days to respond to a
request for an extension of time.
(8) No discovery shall be served upon any party until the special report has been
filed, except as the Court may otherwise order.1
The Court Clerk is directed to mail Plaintiff the necessary forms for requesting issuance
of summonses along with a copy of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of November, 2016.
1
Defendants are advised that a dispositive motion based on the affirmative defense of
failure to exhaust administrative remedies is typically considered a motion for summary
judgment, governed by the procedural rules applicable to such motions. If appropriate,
however, Defendant(s) may seek leave from the Court to file an initial motion for
summary judgment based solely upon this affirmative defense and to have the parties’
discovery initially limited to the nonexhaustion issue. If disposition of such an initial
motion is not dispositive of the entire case, the Court may grant leave for Defendant(s) to
file a second motion for summary judgment. See LCvR 56.1(a).
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?