Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING 22 Report and Recommendation. The final decision of defendant, Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, denying plaintiff, Angela Jones' application for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act is AFFIRMED. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 6/5/2017. (llg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
ANGELA JONES,
Plaintiff,
-vsNANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of the Social Security
Administration,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CIV-16-1146-F
ORDER
On May 19, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin issued a
Report and Recommendation, wherein he recommended defendant’s final decision
denying plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits under the Social
Security Act be affirmed. Magistrate Judge Erwin advised the parties of their right
to file specific objections to the Report and Recommendation by June 2, 2017 and
further advised that failure to make timely objection to the Report and
Recommendation waives the right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues
addressed.
To date, neither party has filed an objection to the Report and
Recommendation or requested an extension of time to file one. With no objection
being filed within the time prescribed by Magistrate Judge Erwin, the court accepts,
adopts and affirms the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 22) issued by United
States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on May 19, 2017 is ACCEPTED,
ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. The final decision of defendant, Nancy A. Berryhill,
Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, denying plaintiff,
Angela Jones’ application for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security
Act is AFFIRMED. Judgment shall issue forthwith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of June, 2017.
16-1146p002.docx
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?