Dopp v. Honaker et al

Filing 109

ORDER granting 104 Motion to Compel and 105 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court directs that CCA Defendants' motion for summary judgment is due no later than April 1, 2019. Signed by Honorable Charles Goodwin on 02/15/2019. (jb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA RICHARD LYNN DOPP, Plaintiff, v. BUDDY HONAKER et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-16-1164-G ORDER Now before the Court is a Motion to Compel filed by Defendants Baird, Neau, Neefe, Paine, and Sellers (the “CCA Defendants”) (Doc. No. 104). In their Motion, the CCA Defendants request that Plaintiff Richard Lynn Dopp be required to sign a release authorizing Defendants to obtain Plaintiff’s medical records from North American Spine Institute (“NASI”). The Court agrees that Plaintiff “has placed [his] physical condition at issue in this case” and that any records from NASI are “relevant to [his] claims.” Schrock v. Pliva USA, Inc., No. 08-453-M, 2010 WL 11508889, at *1 (W.D. Okla. Apr. 2, 2010); see Am. Compl. (Doc. No. 9) at 13. Further, Plaintiff has submitted no objection to the CCA Defendants’ Motion, and thus the Motion is deemed confessed. See LCvR 7.1(g). Accordingly, CCA Defendants’ Motion to Compel Plaintiff to provide a signed medical-record release is GRANTED. CCA Defendants shall mail Plaintiff a release form at his address of record within seven days of this Order. Plaintiff is directed to sign and return the release to CCA Defendants within fourteen days of receipt. If Plaintiff does not comply with this directive, CCA Defendants should notify the Court. CCA Defendants’ Motion for extension of their dispositive-motion deadline (Doc. No. 105) is GRANTED. Rather than striking the deadline, the Court directs that CCA Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is due no later than April 1, 2019. IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of February, 2019. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?