Parker v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING 16 Report and Recommendation. The Social Security Administration's decision is REVERSED, & this case is REMANDED for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 11/9/2017. (llg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA REGINA PARKER, Plaintiff, -vsNANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-16-1191-F ORDER Plaintiff Regina Parker brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the Social Security Administration’s denial of plaintiff’s application for Supplemental Security Income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Magistrate Judge Charles B. Goodwin issued a Report and Recommendation on October 25, 2017 (doc. no. 16), recommending that the court reverse the Commissioner’s decision and remand for further proceedings. In his Report, the Magistrate Judge advised the parties of their right to file objections by November 8, 2017, and advised that failure to file timely objection to the Report waives the right to appeal the factual and legal issues addressed in the Report. Neither party has filed an objection to the Report and neither party has requested an extension of time within which to file any objection to the Report. With no objection being filed, and having reviewed the Report, the record, and the relevant arguments and authorities, the court finds that no purpose would be served by setting out any further analysis here and that the Report should be adopted in its entirety. The court ACCEPTS, AFFIRMS and ADOPTS the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as stated in his Report and Recommendation. The Social Security Administration’s decision is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of November, 2017. 16-1191p002.docx 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?