Gray v. State of Oklahoma
ORDER ADOPTING 9 Report and Recommendation. Plf's 42 U.S.C. §1983 action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 6/14/2017. (llg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ex rel.
Laura Austin Thomas, District Attorney, )
Case No. CIV-17-209-F
On May 17, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell issued a
Report and Recommendation, recommending that plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983
action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.
Magistrate Judge Mitchell’s recommended ruling was based upon plaintiff’s failure
to comply with court orders, together with a court’s right and responsibility to
manage and control its caseload.
In the Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Mitchell advised
plaintiff of his right to file an objection by June 6, 2017 and that failure to make a
timely objection waives the right to appellate review of both factual and legal issues
therein contained. To date, plaintiff has not filed an objection. Instead, on June 12,
2017, plaintiff filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See, doc.
no. 10. Although a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was a document
plaintiff was ordered to file if he intended to proceed with his action and could not
prepay the $400 filing fee, plaintiff was also ordered to complete and file this court’s
form Pro Se Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint. See, doc. no. 8. Plaintiff has not
submitted the form complaint. Because plaintiff has not filed an objection to the
Report and Recommendation within the time prescribed and has not fully complied
with Magistrate Judge Mitchell’s order, the court accepts, adopts and affirms the
Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 9) issued by United
States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell, filed May 17, 2017, is ACCEPTED,
ADOPTED and AFFIMRED. Plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. §1983 action is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. Judgment will
IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of June, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?