Nelson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 29

ORDER ADOPTING 28 Report and Recommendation. The court AFFIRMS the Commissioner's final decision that plf was not "disabled" under the terms of the Social Security Act. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 4/24/2018. (llg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA LISA NELSON, Plaintiff, -vsCOMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-17-0275-F ORDER Plaintiff Lisa Nelson brings this action for judicial review of the Commissioner of the Social Security’s final decision that she was not “disabled” under the terms of the Social Security Act. See, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 423(d)(1)(A). Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell made a Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 28, the Report), recommending entry of judgment affirming the Commissioner’s decision. The Report advised the parties that any objection to the Report was due by April 20, 2018, and that failure to make timely objection to the Report waives the right to appellate review of both factual and legal questions addressed in the Report. No objection to the Report has been filed and no request has been made for an extension of time within which to object or otherwise respond to the Report. Having reviewed the Report, and with there being no objection to the Report, the court concurs in the recommended rulings stated in the Report. Given the detailed analysis contained in the Report, the court finds that no purpose would be served by any further discussion here, and that the Report should be adopted in its entirety. The Report is ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. As recommended in the Report, the court hereby AFFIRMS the Commissioner’s final decision that plaintiff was not “disabled” under the terms of the Social Security Act. IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of April, 2018. 17-0275p001.docx 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?