Braver et al v. Northstar Alarm Services LLC et al

Filing 228

ORDER re 226 Suggestion of Bankruptcy and Automatic Stay filed by Yodel Technologies LLC. The action of plf Robert H. Braver for himself and all individuals similarly situated against dft Yodel Technologies LLC is stayed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362. Until otherwise notified, plfs' action continues as against the remaining dft, NorthStar Alarm Services LLC. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 1/24/2020. (llg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ROBERT H. BRAVER, for himself and all individuals similarly situated, Plaintiff, -vsNORTHSTAR ALARM SERVICES LLC, and YODEL TECHNOLOGIES LLC, et al., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-17-0383-F Defendants. ORDER The court is in receipt of Defendant Yodel Technologies LLC’s notice entitled “Suggestion of Bankruptcy and Automatic Stay,” filed January 23, 2020. Doc. no. 226. The notice advises that on January 23, 2020, defendant Yodel Technologies LLC commenced a bankruptcy proceeding in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida by filing a voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. § § 101-1532 et seq. The action of plaintiff Robert H. Braver for himself and all individuals similarly situated against defendant Yodel Technologies LLC is therefore stayed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362. While section 362 extends stay provisions of the Bankruptcy Code to the “debtor,” the rule followed in the Tenth Circuit and by the majority of other circuits is that the stay provision does not extend to the debtor’s co-defendants. See, Fortier v. Dona Anna Plaza Partners, 747 F.2d 1324, 1330 (10th Cir. 1984). A narrow exception to this rule has been recognized, see, A.H. Robins Co., Inc. v. Piccinin, 788 F.2d 994, 999 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 876 (1986), but there is no indication in the notice that the remaining defendants would fall within the exception. Therefore, until otherwise notified, plaintiffs’ action continues as against the remaining defendant NorthStar Alarm Services LLC. IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of January, 2020. 17-0383p060.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?