Sewell v. Samsung Electronics America Inc et al.

Filing 21

ORDER re 20 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Stay Case. The Court directs the Clerk to administrative close this case in her records. Within thirty (30) days of the final disposition of the Wells/Higginbotham litigation, the parties may move to reopen this action. If the parties have not moved to reopen this action within the prescribed time, it will be deemed to be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 6/21/17. (ml)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA SUSAN SEWELL, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-17-434-D ORDER The parties to this action have filed an Agreed Motion [Doc. No. 20], asking that the Court stay these proceedings pending the resolution of two related cases currently before the Court: Wells v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al., Case No. CIV-17-46-D and Higginbotham v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al., Case No. CIV-17-102-D (hereinafter the “Wells/Higginbotham litigation”).1 Rather than staying this case for an indeterminate amount of time, the Court directs the Clerk to administrative close this case in her records. Within thirty (30) days of the final disposition of the Wells/Higginbotham litigation, the parties may 1 The parties also request that the Consolidated Complaint filed in the Wells/Higginbotham litigation [Doc. No. 15] be designated as the operative complaint in this action. The Court declines to do so at this time. move to reopen this action. If the parties have not moved to reopen this action within the prescribed time, it will be deemed to be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of June 2017. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?