Cotner v. Bear

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 11 and dismissing the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus upon filing as an unauthorized successive petition, as untimely, and for failure to comply with previously imposed filing restrictions. Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 9/5/2017. (ks)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ROBERT COTNER, Petitioner, vs. WARDEN BEAR, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-17-757-M ORDER On August 16, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell issued a Supplemental Report and Recommendation in this action. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed upon filing as an unauthorized successive petition, as untimely, and for failure to comply with previously imposed filing restrictions. Petitioner was advised of his right to object to the Supplemental Report and Recommendation by September 5, 2017. Petitioner has filed a number of pleadings objecting to the Supplemental Report and Recommendation. Upon de novo review, the Court: (1) ADOPTS the Supplemental Report and Recommendation [docket no. 11] issued by the Magistrate Judge on August 16, 2017, and (2) DISMISSES the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus upon filing as an unauthorized successive petition, as untimely, and for failure to comply with previously imposed filing restrictions. IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of September, 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?