Cotner v. Bear

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 11 and dismissing the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus upon filing as an unauthorized successive petition, as untimely, and for failure to comply with previously imposed filing restrictions. Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 9/5/2017. (ks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
ROBERT COTNER,
Petitioner,
vs.
WARDEN BEAR,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CIV-17-757-M

ORDER
On August 16, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell issued a
Supplemental Report and Recommendation in this action. The Magistrate Judge recommended
that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed upon filing as an unauthorized
successive petition, as untimely, and for failure to comply with previously imposed filing
restrictions. Petitioner was advised of his right to object to the Supplemental Report and
Recommendation by September 5, 2017. Petitioner has filed a number of pleadings objecting to
the Supplemental Report and Recommendation.
Upon de novo review, the Court:
(1)

ADOPTS the Supplemental Report and Recommendation [docket no. 11] issued by
the Magistrate Judge on August 16, 2017, and

(2)

DISMISSES the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus upon filing as an unauthorized
successive petition, as untimely, and for failure to comply with previously imposed
filing restrictions.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of September, 2017.