Taylor v. Prator

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 5 and dismissing this action without prejudice to refiling. Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 10/13/2017. (ks)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA TUCARA ANN TAYLOR Petitioner, Vs. DAVID PRATER, District Attorney, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-17-871-M ORDER On September 14, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Gary Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation in this action brought seeking a writ of mandamus. The Petitioner was ordered to cure deficiency in that she had not submitted an in forma pauperis application or paid the filing fee. After the forms had been mailed to the Petitioner, she failed to comply with the Magistrate Judge’s Order. The Magistrate Judge recommended the dismissal of this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), without prejudice to refiling. Petitioner was advised of her right to object to the Report and Recommendation. A review of the file reveals no objection has been filed. Accordingly, upon de novo review, the Court: (1) ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [docket no. 5] issued by the Magistrate Judge on September 14, 2017, and (2) DISMISSES this action without prejudice to refiling. IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of October, 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?