Lane v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al

Filing 11

JUDGMENT. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 5/22/20. (kmt)

Case 5:17-cv-01056-D Document 11 Filed 05/22/20 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN RE: SAMSUNG TOP-LOAD
WASHING MACHINE MARKETING,
SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS
LIABILITY LITIGATION
This document relates to:
ALL CASES

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

MDL Case No. 17-ml-2792-D
District Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti

JUDGMENT
In a separate Order, incorporated herein by reference, the Court decided the Motion
by Plaintiffs and Class Counsel [Doc. No. 152] asking for final approval of the proposed
Settlement Agreement. Considering the Motion and related briefing, presentations at the
fairness hearing, a series of supplemental briefs, and subsequent disclosures of side
agreements, the Court certified the Settlement Class1 and granted final approval of the
Settlement Agreement.
Consistent with that Order, the Court hereby enters judgment effectuating the
Parties’ Settlement and dismissing with prejudice all claims alleged in the Consolidated
MDL Lawsuit and in each of the consolidated Lawsuits against all Defendants and
Defendant Retailers.

terms undefined in this Judgment are given the definition reflected in the
Settlement Agreement. 

1

 Capitalized

1 

Case 5:17-cv-01056-D Document 11 Filed 05/22/20 Page 2 of 2

In entering this Judgment the Court specifically refers to and invokes the Full Faith
and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution and the doctrine of comity, and requests
that any court in any other jurisdiction reviewing, construing, or applying the Court’s Order
and Judgment implement and enforce its terms in their entirety.
Without affecting the finality of the Order and this Judgment in any way, the Court
hereby reserves jurisdiction over: (1) implementation of the Settlement Agreement; (2) all
matters related to the administration and consummation of the Settlement Agreement; and
(3) all Parties to the Consolidated MDL Lawsuit, including any and all Parties to the
consolidated Lawsuits, for the purpose of implementing, enforcing, monitoring compliance
with, effectuating, administering, and interpreting the provisions of the Settlement
Agreement and the related Order and Judgment.
In its Order, the Court noted instances in which Defendants made certain
concessions having to do with the administration and logistical details of providing the
relief set forth in the Settlement Agreement. These matters are included within the Court’s
express retention of jurisdiction to ensure performance under the Settlement Agreement.
ENTERED this 22nd day of May, 2020.

2