Miera v. Director of Corrections
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 14 of Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin...the petition for habeas relief is denied...the court also concludes that a certificiate of appealability should not be issued because petitioner has failed to demonstrate "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right". Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 09/07/2021. (lam)
Case 5:21-cv-00070-HE Document 23 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
CARLOS JAMES MIERA, JR.,
Petitioner Carlos James Miera, Jr., a state prisoner appearing pro se, filed this case
seeking habeas relief from his state court conviction. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)
and (C), the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin for initial proceedings.
After reviewing petitioner’s filings, Judge Erwin ordered the Oklahoma Attorney General
to respond to the petition. Judge Erwin has now issued a Report and Recommendation
recommending that the petition be denied. Petitioner has objected to the Report which
triggers de novo review of matters to which objection has been made.
The petition raises two grounds for relief, denial of due process and ineffective
assistance of appellate counsel.
Petitioner’s objection fails to address the Report’s
recommendations as to either of these grounds for relief. Rather, the objection appears to
raise a separate ground for relief, that the trial court erred in permitting the jury to break
sequestration — an issued that was raised before and rejected by the Oklahoma Court of
Case 5:21-cv-00070-HE Document 23 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 2
Criminal Appeals in petitioner’s direct appeal of his conviction.1 Because this issue is not
raised in the petition and addressed in the Report, the court will not consider this argument.
The court concludes that the Report properly addresses the grounds for relief raised in the
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. #14] is ADOPTED. The
petition for habeas relief is DENIED. The court also concludes that a certificate of
appealability should not issue because petitioner has failed to demonstrate “a substantial
showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 7th day of September, 2021.
While not ruling on this ground for relief, the court notes that the OCCA’s decision on this issue
was neither contrary to or an unreasonable application of federal law nor was it based on an
unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?