Sisk v. Cimarron Correctional Facility

Filing 9

ORDER ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Charles Goodwin on 04/27/2021. (jb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA GEORGE EDWARD SISK, Plaintiff, v. CIMARRON CORR. FAC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-21-141-G ORDER Plaintiff George Edward Sisk filed this federal civil rights action on February 22, 2021. See Compl. (Doc. No. 1). In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell for preliminary review. On March 25, 2021, Judge Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 7), in which she recommended that this action be dismissed due to Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and to comply with Court orders. In the Report and Recommendation, Judge Mitchell advised Plaintiff of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation by April 15, 2021. Judge Mitchell also advised that a failure to timely object would constitute a waiver of the right to appellate review of the factual findings and legal conclusions contained in the Report and Recommendation. The Report and Recommendation was mailed to Plaintiff at the address he provided to the Court. As of this date, Plaintiff has not submitted an objection to the Report and Recommendation or sought leave for additional time to do so. CONCLUSION Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 7) is ADOPTED in its entirety. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate judgment shall be entered. IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of April, 2021. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?