Woods v. Nunn

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 5 ) is ADOPTED, and Petitioner's application (Doc. No. 2 ) is DENIED. This matter is re-referred to Judge Purcell for further proceedings consistent with the initial case referral. Signed by Honorable Charles Goodwin on 04/27/2021. (jb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DAVID DEAN WOODS, Petitioner, v. SCOTT NUNN, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-21-237-G ORDER This matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on April 2, 2021. Judge Purcell recommends that Petitioner’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied because Petitioner has sufficient funds to pay the $5.00 filing fee. Within the time period for a written objection, Petitioner has paid the required $5.00 fee. See Doc. No. 6. Accordingly, the Court finds that Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is moot. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 5) is ADOPTED, and Petitioner’s application (Doc. No. 2) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is re-referred to Judge Purcell for further proceedings consistent with the initial case referral. IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of April, 2021.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?