Christian v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
ORDER accepting 24 Report and Recommendation and affirming the decision of Defendant. A separate judgment in favor of Defendant will follow. Signed by Judge Jodi W. Dishman on 11/13/2023. (nv)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
KENDALL PAT CHRISTIAN,
Acting Commissioner of the
Social Security Administration,
Case No. CIV-22-01000-JD
Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell’s Report and
Recommendation (“R. & R.”) [Doc. No. 24] issued on October 16, 2023. Judge Mitchell
recommends that the Court affirm the final decision of Defendant. R. & R. at 16.
Judge Mitchell advised Plaintiff that he may file an objection to the Report and
Recommendation with the Clerk of Court by October 30, 2023, and that failure to timely
object to the Report and Recommendation waives the right to appellate review of both
factual and legal issues contained in the Report and Recommendation. Id. (citing Moore
v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991)).
The record reflects that Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Report and
Recommendation by the deadline or request an extension of time to do so. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions
of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is
made.”) (emphasis added); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must determine
de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected
to.”) (emphasis added).
Upon its review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly,
the Court ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 24] and AFFIRMS the
decision of Defendant. A separate judgment in favor of Defendant will follow.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of November 2023.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?