Romero v. Harpe et al

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ~ The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation 10 and DISMISSES the Complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge Bernard M. Jones on 6/4/2024. (dwl)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
ALBERT ANDREW ROMERO,
Plaintiff,
v.
STEVEN HARPE, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CIV-24-325-J

ORDER
Plaintiff, a state prisoner appearing pro se, filed a complaint alleging violations of his civil
rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Shon
T. Erwin consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). [Doc. No. 3]. On May 14, 2024, Judge Erwin
issued a Report and Recommendation recommending the Court dismiss the Complaint, without
prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff has filed
objections to the Report and Recommendation which triggers de novo review. [Doc. Nos. 11 and
12]. Having carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation and Plaintiff’s objections, the
Court concludes that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and that
the Complaint should be dismissed.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and

Recommendation [Doc. No. 10] and DISMISSES the Complaint without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of June, 2024.