Romero v. Harpe et al
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ~ The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation 10 and DISMISSES the Complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge Bernard M. Jones on 6/4/2024. (dwl)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
ALBERT ANDREW ROMERO,
Plaintiff,
v.
STEVEN HARPE, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CIV-24-325-J
ORDER
Plaintiff, a state prisoner appearing pro se, filed a complaint alleging violations of his civil
rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Shon
T. Erwin consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). [Doc. No. 3]. On May 14, 2024, Judge Erwin
issued a Report and Recommendation recommending the Court dismiss the Complaint, without
prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff has filed
objections to the Report and Recommendation which triggers de novo review. [Doc. Nos. 11 and
12]. Having carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation and Plaintiff’s objections, the
Court concludes that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and that
the Complaint should be dismissed.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and
Recommendation [Doc. No. 10] and DISMISSES the Complaint without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of June, 2024.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?