Seagraves v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Filing
6
ORDER ADOPTING 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION in full. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is dismissed without prejudice for Petitioner's failure to comply with orders of the Court. Signed by Judge Patrick R Wyrick on 1/7/2025. (ekw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ROMEO E. SEAGRAVES,
Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Respondent.
Case No. CIV-24-1013-PRW
ORDER
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green’s Report and
Recommendation (Dkt. 5), recommending that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Dkt. 1) be dismissed without prejudice for failure to
comply with court orders. Judge Green advised Petitioner of his right to object to the Report
and Recommendation and that any failure to object would result in a waiver of the right to
appellate review. 1 Petitioner has filed no objection to the Report and Recommendation.
This Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Green’s Report and Recommendation
(Dkt. 5) and agrees with the reasoning and conclusions therein. Accordingly, the Court
hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 5) in full. Petitioner’s Petition for
Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Dkt 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice
for Petitioner’s failure to comply with orders of the Court.
See Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991); United States v. 2121 E.
30th St., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996).
1
1
IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of January 2025.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?