Wilkerson v. Southward et al

Filing 14

ORDER denying as moot 9 Motion to Dismiss and 10 Amended Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Charles Goodwin on 03/05/2025. (jb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
JOE M. WILKERSON,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
KENT SOUTHWARD, individually
)
and in his official capacity as the
)
Superintendent of Ringling Independent )
School District No. 14,
)
)
Defendant.
)

Case No. CIV-24-1278-G

ORDER
Now before the Court are Defendant Kent Southward’s Motions to Dismiss (Doc.
Nos. 9, 10). Since the filing of the Motion, Plaintiff Joe M. Wilkerson has timely filed an
Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 11). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B).
Accordingly, Defendant’s Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 9, 10) are DENIED AS
MOOT. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991) (“[A]n
amended complaint ordinarily supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect.”).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of March, 2025.