Goff v. Washington et al

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING 9 Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate judgment of dismissal shall be entered contemporaneously with this Order. Signed by Judge Scott L. Palk on 3/7/2025. (llg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
JAMARCO GOFF,
Plaintiff,
v.
FNU WASHINGTON, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CIV-24-1287-SLP

ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States
Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green [Doc. No. 9].

The Magistrate Judge

recommends that the Court dismiss this action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to
comply with the Court’s Orders [Doc. Nos. 4, 6, 8]. See R&R [Doc. No. 12] at 1-4. The
Magistrate Judge advised Plaintiff of his right to object to the R&R and directed that any
objections be filed on or before March 5, 2025. Id. at 3. No objection has been filed, nor
has an extension of time in which to object been sought or granted.1
Upon review, the Court fully concurs with the analysis set forth in the R&R.
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 9] is ADOPTED and this action

1

The docket reflects that the R&R was returned as undeliverable. [Doc. No. 13]. Plaintiff is
responsible for providing notice of any change of address to the Court. See LCvR5.4(a) (requiring
written notice of a change of address and further providing that papers sent by the Court are
“deemed delivered if sent to the last known address given to the court.”); see also Theede v. United
States Dep’t of Labor, 172 F.3d 1262, 1267-68 (10th Cir. 1999) (pro se plaintiff who failed to
provide any change of address waived right to review of report and recommendation by failing to
make a timely objection).

is DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate judgment of dismissal shall be entered
contemporaneously with this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of March, 2025.