Brown v. Institution

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION For the reasons stated therein, Petitioners Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis 2 is DENIED. If Petitioners filing fee is not received by the Clerk of the Court on or before March 31, 2025, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti on 3/11/2025. (jee)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
FRANKIE JOE BROWN,
Petitioner,
v.
EL RENO INSTITUTION,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CIV-25-202-D

ORDER
Upon review of the file and noting no timely objection to the findings and
recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1), the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 5], in its entirety.
For the reasons stated therein, Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma
pauperis [Doc. No. 2] is DENIED. If Petitioner’s filing fee is not received by the Clerk of
the Court on or before March 31, 2025, this action will be dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of March, 2025.

. DeGIUSTI
Chief United States District Judge