Mendacino v. Nooth

Filing 37

Opinion and Order: Adopting Judge Clarke's Report & Recommendation: Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(2254) 21 should be Denied 31 . The petition 1 is denied and this action is dismissed. Because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(2). IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj)

Mendacino v. Nooth

Doc. 37

FILED"10 ,JUL 12 '3 6BIJSDC·ORt·1

IN THE UNITED STATES D I S T R I C T COURT FOR THE D I S T R I C T OF OREGON PHYLL MENDACINO, Petitioner,
v.

Civ. No. 08-485-CL
OPINION AND ORDER

MARK NOOTH, Respondent.

PANNER, D i s t r i c t J u d g e :

M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e M a r k D. C l a r k e f i l e d a R e p o r t a n d Recommendation and the matter is:loW before t h i s court. U.S.C.
§

S e e 28

636(b) (1) (B),

F e d . R. C i v . P . 7 2 ( b ) .

Petitioner has

filed objections [#33J, and I hav2 reviewed the f i l e of t h i s case de novo. 28 U.S.C.
§

636(b) (1) (c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v.

Commodore Bus. Mach., I n c . , 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I conclude the Rand R is correct.

IIII IIII
1 - OPINION AND ORDER

Dockets.Justia.com

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#31) i s adopted. dismissed. The p e t i t i o n (#1) is denied and this action i s

B e c a u s e p e t i t i o n e r haEi n o t m a d e a s u b s t a n t i a l s h o w i n g

of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of a p p e a l a b i l i t y i s DENIED. See 28 U.S.C.
§

2253(2).

I T I S SO ORDERED.

DATED t h i s

/ > / day

of July, 2010.

OWEN M. PANNER U . S . D I S T R I C T JUDGE

2 - ORDER