Rushfeldt v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 22

ORDER: Adopting Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation 20 . (Please access document by number hyperlink for complete review and details of order.) Signed on 11/19/09 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (jw)

Download PDF
FILED'09NOV 1912:12usoc.fJRN I N THE UNITED STATES D I S T R I C T COURT FOR THE D I S T R I C T OF OREGON SHARON RUSHFELDT, Plaintiff, C i v i l No. 08-1456-CL ORDER v. MICHAEL J . AS TRUE , Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. PAlmER, J u d g e . On N o v e m b e r 3 , 2 0 0 9 , M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e C l a r k e f i l e d h i s Report and Recommendation, which recommends reversing the decision of the Commissioner and remanding the matter for further administrative proceedings. Recommendation. No p a r t y h a s o b j e c t e d t o t h a t T h e m a t t e r i s n o w b e f o r e me f o r d e n o v o r e v i e w § pursuant t o 28 U.S.C. 6 3 6 ( b ) ( 1 ) (B) a n d F e d . R . c i v . P . 7 2 ( b ) . Conclusion Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (docket # 20) are adopted. The decision of the Commissioner i s reversed and the matter remanded, pursuant t o sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings. On r e m a n d , t h e A d m i n i s t r a t i v e L a w J u d g e ( I I A L J I I ) w i l l r e evaluate the evidence as is stated in Judge Clarke's Report and 1 - ORDER Recommendation. If determined to be necessary following that re- evaluation, the ALJ w i l l r e v i s e h i s Residual Functional Capacity analysis and apply the correct medical-vocational guideline or obtain vocational expert testimony regarding Rushfeldt's workplace limitations. The ALJ w i l l then make adequate s t e p four and five findings in light of the foregoing analysis. I T I S SO ORDERED. DATED t h i s 1 9 t h d a y o f N o v e m b e r , 2 0 0 9 . tJfift4t~ Owen M. P a n n e r united States District Judge 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?