Rise v. Coursey
Filing
33
Opinion and order RE: Findings & Recommendation: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254 2 should be denied 29 . Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation 29 is adopted. The petition 2 is denied and this action is dismissed. Signed on 12/21/2010 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj)
Rise v. Coursey
Doc. 33
IN THE UNITED STATES D I S T R I C T COURT FOR THE D I S T R I C T OF OREGON ERIC R I S E , Petitioner, Civ. No. 09-893-CL OPINION AND ORDER
v.
RICK COURSEY, Respondent.
PANNER, D i s t r i c t J u d g e : M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e M a r k D. C l a r k e f i l e d a R e p o r t a n d R e c o m m e n d a t i o n ( n R a n d Rn ) [ # 2 9 J , a n d t h e m a t t e r i s now b e f o r e
l : h i s c o u r t . S e e 2 8 U . S . C . § 6 3 6 ( b ) ( 1 ) ( B ) , F e d . R. C i v . P . 7 2 ( b ) . O n e d a y p r i o r t o t h e R a n d R, p e t i t i o n e r f i l e d P e t i t i o n e r ' s R e s p o n s e To R e s p o n d e n t ' s R e s p o n s e t o P e t i t i o n F o r W r i t Of H a b e a s Corpus [#26J. I construe petitioner's response, as well as the a m e n d e d r e s p o n s e [ # 2 8 J a s o b j e c t i o n s t o t h e R a n d R. Accordingly,
I have reviewed t h e f i l e of t h i s case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I conclude the Rand R
is correct.
1 - O P I N I O N AND ORDER
Dockets.Justia.com
Magistrate J u d g e C l a r k e ' s R e p o r t a n d R e c o m m e n d a t i o n [ # 2 9 J i s a d o p t e d . The p e t i t i o n [#2J i s d e n i e d a n d t h i s a c t i o n i s d i s m i s s e d . Because p e t i t i o n e r has not made a s u b s t a n t i a l showing of the denial of a constitutional =ight, a certificate of appealability i s DENIED. S e e 2 8 U . S . C . I T I S SO ORDERED.
§
:2253(2).
DATED t h i s
";7
'
day·
0·=
December,
2010.
OWEN M. PANNER U . S . D I S T R I C T JUDGE
~:
- ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?