Stafford v. Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision

Filing 65

ORDER: Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation 60 is adopted; Granting in Part Denying in Part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 38 ; Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 47 . Judgment is for defendants. Signed on 4/9/2010 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj)

FILEIi~·f 0 H'-r-,-, ., .' . _ l . r'k ':1 11 ",.. . - - 'cc.'USDC-ORf1

I N THE UNITED STATES D I S T R I C T COURT FOR THE D I S T R I C T OF OREGON N E I L B . STAFFORD, Civ. No. Plaintiff, v. STEVEN POWERS, e t a l . , Defendants. 09-3031-CL

ORDER

PANNER, D i s t r i c t J u d g e :
M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e M a r k D. C l a r k e f i l e d a R e p o r t a n d Recommendation, and t h e m a t t e r i s now b e f o r e t h i s c o u r t . U.s.C.
§

See 28

636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b).

When e i t h e r p a r t y

objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the d i s t r i c t court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C.
§

636(b) (1) (C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Inc., 656 F. 2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).

Bus. Mach.,

Here, petitioner objects to the Report and Recommendation,

1-

ORDER

and I h a v e r e v i e w e d t h i s m a t t e r d e n o v o .

I agree with the Report

and Recommendation that defendants are e n t i t l e d to immunity from p l a i n t i f f ' s damages claims. I also agree that plaintiff failed to

show t h a t the predatory sex offender designation v i o l a t e d h i s due process rights.
CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#60) i s adopted. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (#38) i s granted P l a i n t i f f ' s motion for summary Judgment i s for defendants.

in part and denied in part. judgment (#47) i s denied. I T I S SO ORDERED. DATED t h i s

~

day of April, 2010.

OWEN M. PANNER U . S . D I S T R I C T JUDGE

2 - ORDER