Hendrix v. State of Oregon et al
Filing
7
ORDER: Adopting Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation 5 . This case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed on 7/12/2010 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj)
Hendrix v. State of Oregon et al
Doc. 7
FILED'
to .JUL 12 ·U;:44usDC-ORt·'
I N THE UNITED STATES D I S T R I C T COURT FOR THE D I S T R I C T OF OREGON TERRENCE C . HENDRIX Civ. No.10-333-CL Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OREGON, Defendant.
ORDER
PANNER, D i s t r i c t J u d g e :
M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e M a r k D. C l a r k e f i l e d a R e p o r t a n d Recommendation, and t h e m a t t e r i s now b e f o r e t h i s c o u r t . Fed. R. C i v . P. 72(b). Although no See 28
U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B),
objections have been filed, principles de novo. 1202, 1206
this court reviews the legal 700 F.2d
See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd.,
(9th Cir. 1983). I find no e r r o r in
I have given this matter de novo review. the Report and Recommendation.
1-
ORDER
Dockets.Justia.com
CONCLUSION Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#5) adopted. This case is dismissed with prejudice. is
I T I S SO ORDERED.
DATED t h i s
day of July, 2010.
OWEN M. PANNER U . S . D I S T R I C T JUDGE
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?