McQueen v. Klamath County

Filing 12

OPINION AND ORDER : Adopting Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation 10 . The amended petition 8 is denied and this action is dismissed without prejudice to re-file upon exhaustion of the claims. Certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed on 12/27/2010 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj)

McQueen v. Klamath County

Doc. 12

IN THE UNITED STATES D I S T R I C T COURT FOR THE D I S T R I C T OF OREGON MARK D. MCQUEEN, Petitioner, v. KLAMATH COUNTY, Respondent. Civ. No. 10-893-CL

OPINION AND ORDER

PANNER, D i s t r i c t J u d g e :
M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e M a r k D. C l a r k e f i l e d a R e p o r t a n d Recommendation, and t h e m a t t e r i s now b e f o r e t h i s c o u r t . See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (8), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b). Although no objections have been filed, principles de novo. See this court reviews the legal Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d

~Lorin

1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983). I conclude that the Rand R i s correct.

CONCLUSION
Magistrate Judge 1 - O P I N I O N AND ORDER
ClarkE~'s

Report and Recommendation (#10)

is

Dockets.Justia.com

adopted. T h e a m e n d e d p e t i t i o n ( # 8 )

is denied and this action is

dismissed without prejudice to r e - f i l e upon exhaustion of the claims. Because petitioner the denial of a
~as

not made a s u b s t a n t i a l showing of right, a certificate of
§

constitu~io~al
Sel~

a p p e a l a b i l i t y i s DENIED.

28 U.S.C.

2253(2).

I T I S SO ORDER2D.

DATED t h i s

7--:~ d a y o f D e c e m b e r ,

2010.

OWEN M. PANNER U . S . D I S T R I C T JUDGE

2

- ORDER