Blocker v. Premo

Filing 6

ORDER: Adopting Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation 4 . This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed on 3/14/2011 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj)

Blocker v. Premo

Doc. 6

FILED'l1 folAR 1411:42l!SDC-ORf'I

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON TYRONE BLOCKER, Civ. No. 10-1411-CL Plaintiff, v. J. PREMO, SUPERINTENDENT, Defendant. ORDER

PANNER, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court.
U.S~C.

See 28

§

636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). this court

Although no

objections have been filed, principles novo.

ews the legal

Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d

1202, 1206 ·(9th Cir. 1983). In November 2010, this court notified plaintiff that he must pay a filing fee or apply to proceed in forma pauperis. This

court also advised plaintiff that the complaint failed to state a

1

ORDER

Dockets.Justia.com

claim

could be

ssed without service on de in forma

Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, applied to proce ris, or requested an extension of time. the

Accordingly, I ADOPT

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke. CONCLUSION Magistrate Judge Clarke's rt and Recommendation (#4) is

adopt

This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure

to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this of March, 2011.

OWEN M. PANNER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

2 - ORDER