Chancey v. Washington Mutual Asset-Backed Certificates WMABS Series 2007-HE2 Trust Issuing Entity et al

Filing 25

ORDER: Adopting Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke's Report and Recommendation 22 . Plaintiff's TARP claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's claim against Chase and Washington Mutual are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff is granted 30 days to amend the complaint to name the FDIC as a party. Should the clerk receive undeliverable mail as a result of a failure to notify the clerk of any change in mailing address, the court may, after 60 days, dismiss the complaint, strike the pleadings, or enter a default. See Local Rule 83-12. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 8/23/2010 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj)

Chancey v. Washington Mutual Asset-Backed Certificates WMABS Series 2007-H...st Issuing Entity et al

Doc. 25

FILED'I0 AUG 2:3 U::36uSDC·O~ll

I N THE UNITED STATES D I S T R I C T COURT FOR THE D I S T R I C T OF OREGON SCOTT CHANCEY, Civ. No. 10-3007-CL Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL ASSET BACKED C E R T I F I C A T E S WMABS S E R I E S 2 0 0 7 HE2 TRUST I S S U I N G E N T I T Y ; e t a l , Defendants.

ORDER

PANNER, D i s t r i c t J u d g e :
M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e M a r k D. C l a r k e f i l e d a R e p o r t a n d Recommendation, and t h e m a t t e r i s now b e f o r e t h i s c o u r t . u.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b). Although no See 28

objections have been filed, principles de novo.

this court reviews the legal 700 F.2d

See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd.,

1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983). I have given this matter de novo review. Accordingly, I find no e r r o r . As

I ADOPT t h e R e p o r t a n d R e c o m m e n d a t i o n [ # 2 2 ] .

1-

ORDER

Dockets.Justia.com

stated i n t h e R e p o r t a n d R e c o m m e n d a t i o n , p l a i n t i f f ' s TARP c l a i m i s DISMISSED w i t h p r e j u d i c e . P l a i n t i f f ' s claims against Chase and Plaintiff is

W a s h i n g t o n M u t u a l a r e DISMISSED w i t h p r e j u d i c e .

g r a n t e d 3 0 d a y s t o a m e n d t h e c o m p l a i n t t o n a m e t h e FDIC a s a party. P l a i n t i f f should note that under Local Rule 83-10, he has

an ongoing duty to notify the Clerk of Court of any changes in his mailing address. Should the clerk receive undeliverable mail as a

result of a failure to notify the clerk of any change in mailing a d d r e s s , t h e c o u r t m a y , a f t e r 60 d a y s , d i s m i s s t h e c o m p l a i n t , strike the pleadings, or enter a default. I T I S SO ORDERED. See Local Rule 83-12.

DATED t h i s

-z-,Vf/IIU ~day

;J1'// l i P

of August, 2010.

OWEN M. PANNER U . S . D I S T R I C T JUDGE

~ ~ l/L 142H~d

2 - ORDER