Memmott v. Onewest Bank, FSB et al

Filing 67

ORDER: Adopting Report and Recommendation 58 ; Granting Motion to Dismiss 9 ; Granting in Part Denying in Part Motion to Dismiss 14 . Ordered & Signed on 4/25/11 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (kf)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON DONNA JENE MEMMOTT, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 10-3042-CL v. ORDER ONEWEST BANK, FSB, and REGIONAL TRUSTEE SERVICES CORPORATION, Defendants. PANNER, District Judge: On February 9, 2011, Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (#58), and the matter is now before this c ou rt. See 28 U. S . C. § 636 (b) (1) (B), Fe d. R. Ci v. P. 72 (b) . Plaintiff and defendant Regional Trustee Services Corporation filed objections, and responses were filed to the objections. Therefore, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 1 - ORDER 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981) .On April 19, 2011, I presided over oral ar With one addition, Ma Recommendation (#58) is s regarding the objections. strate Judge ed. At the beginning of the first full paragraph on page 11 (just nor Regional ior to "Since neither OneWest ."), I include the following: At this st in t a "debt col ector" deciding, that the FDCPA." ings, I conclude OneWest is FDCPA. I assume, without also a "debt collector" under This matter is re to Magistrate Judge Clarke for further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this ~a--daYOf April, 2011. OWEN M. PANNER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2 - ORDER rke's Report and

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?