Memmott v. Onewest Bank, FSB et al
Filing
67
ORDER: Adopting Report and Recommendation 58 ; Granting Motion to Dismiss 9 ; Granting in Part Denying in Part Motion to Dismiss 14 . Ordered & Signed on 4/25/11 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (kf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
DONNA JENE MEMMOTT,
Plaintiff,
Civ. No. 10-3042-CL
v.
ORDER
ONEWEST BANK, FSB, and
REGIONAL TRUSTEE SERVICES
CORPORATION,
Defendants.
PANNER, District Judge:
On February 9,
2011, Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a
Report and Recommendation (#58), and the matter is now before this
c ou rt. See 28 U. S . C. § 636 (b) (1) (B),
Fe d. R. Ci v.
P. 72 (b) .
Plaintiff and defendant Regional Trustee Services Corporation
filed objections, and responses were filed to the objections.
Therefore,
I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. 28
U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus.
Mach.,
Inc.,
1 - ORDER
656 F.2d 1309, 1313
(9th Cir. 1981) .On April 19,
2011, I presided over oral ar
With one addition, Ma
Recommendation (#58) is
s regarding the objections.
strate Judge
ed. At the beginning of the first
full paragraph on page 11 (just
nor Regional
ior to "Since neither OneWest
."), I include the following:
At this st
in t
a "debt col ector"
deciding, that
the FDCPA."
ings, I conclude OneWest is
FDCPA. I assume, without
also a "debt collector" under
This matter is re
to Magistrate Judge Clarke for
further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
~a--daYOf
April, 2011.
OWEN M. PANNER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
2 - ORDER
rke's Report and
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?