Doe et al v. Medford School District 549C et al

Filing 71

ORDER: Adopting Report and Recommendation 60 ; Denying Motion to Strike 49 ; Granting in Part Denying in Part Motion to Dismiss 42 . Ordered & Signed on 3/18/11 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (kf) Modified text on 3/18/2011 (kf).

Doe et al v. Medford School District 549C et al

Doc. 71

FILED'11 t1RR 18 11 :02USIIC·ORt1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JANE DOE, by and through her an Christina H., et a Plaintiffs,
v.

Civ. No. 10-3113-CL

MEDFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT 549C, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

PANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Re,commendation, and t U.S.C.
§

matter is now before this court. Although no

28

636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

objections

been filed, this court reviews the legal

principles de novo.
1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).
I have gi v,en the Magistrate Judge Clarke 1 issues de novo review. I agree with

plaintiffs' motion to strike

1

ORDER

Dockets.Justia.com

be denied.

I also

agre~

that defendants' motions to di

ss

should be granted in part and denied in part, as explained in the and Recommendation's thorough discussion. Accordingly, I

ADOPT the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.
CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#60) is adopted. De Plaintiffs' motion to strike (#49)
s' motion to dismiss

is denied. ed in part and denied

(#42) is

in part as

lained by the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this day of March, 2011.

OWEN M. PANNER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

2

ORDER