Sequoia Partners, LLC et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
Filing
37
ORDER: Adopting Report and Recommendation 32 ; Granting w/ prejudice Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 16 . Ordered & Signed on 5/10/12 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (kf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
SEQUOIA PARTNERS, LLC, and
SEQUOIA VILLAGE, LLC,
No. 1:11-cv-03057-CL
P
intiffs,
v.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORP., and SOUTH VALLEY
BANK & TRUST,
ORDER
Defendants.
PANNER, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and
Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court.
U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
When e
See 28
her party
objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation, the district court makes a
of that
novo det
ion of the Magistrate Judge's report.
ion
28 U.S.C. §
636(b) (1) (C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach.,
656 F. 2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).
Here, plaintiffs object to the Report and Recommendation, so
1 -
ORDER
I
I have
t
Judge Clarke
smatter de novo.
I agree with Magistrate
the statute of frauds bars plaintif
ims.
Plaintif
neither alleged nor presented evidence of an
enforceable wr
ten loan agreement.
Plaintiffs argue that they should be allowed to
amended compl
Ie an
and to present additional evidence of a
loan agreement.
iffs have had several opportunit
en
s to
submit documents supplying the essential terms of a loan
agreement, and they have failed to do so.
As Magistrate Judge
Clark notes, "If plaintiffs had signed a note for the $2.4 million
loan, they would allege such in their complaint.
allowing
H
I conclude that
iffs to amend the complaint would
i
Dismissal must be with prejudice.
Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendat
of
Magistrate Judge Clarke.
CONCLUSION
Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#32) is
adopted.
De
s' motion to dismiss
(#16) is grant
prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED
s ~ day of May, 2012.
OWEN M. PANNER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
2
ORDER
with
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?