Boronda v. Moye et al

Filing 70

ORDER: Adopting Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation 66 ; Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 52 . Signed on 3/7/2013 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
MEDFORD DIVISION
MICHAEL A. BORONDA,
No. 1:11-cv-3082-CL
Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

SARA MOYE and JOSEPHINE
COUNTY,
Defendants.

PANNER, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and
Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court.
U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B),

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

See 28

When either party

objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation, the district court makes a de novo determination
of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report.

28 U.S.C. §

636 (b) (1) (C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach.,
Inc.,

656 F. 2d 1309, 1313

1 - ORDER

(9th Cir. 1981).

Here, plaintiff objects to the Report and Recommendation, so
I have reviewed this matter de novo.

I agree with Magistrate

Judge Clarke that defendants have shown they are entitled to
summary judgment.

Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and

Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.
CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#66)
adopted.

Defendants' motion for summary judgment (#52) is

granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this

~day

of March, 2013.

~RJ{~
OWEN M. PANNER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

2 - ORDER

is