Logan v. Sebelius et al

Filing 69

ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 64 is adopted. Defendants' motion for summary judgment 55 is GRANTED. Ordered and Signed on 05/10/2013 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (rsm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON KONNI LOGAN, an individual, Plaintiff, v. 1:12-cv-118-CL ORDER KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al., Defendants. PANNER, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation and the matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b). Plaintiff filed objections and I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1) (c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., 1 - ORDER § Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I conclude the Report is correct. While plaintiff may be correct in stating the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) was supported by substantial evidence, that is not the applicable standard of review. Instead, as noted in the Report, the court must review the decision of the Appeals Council to determine whether that decision, as opposed to the decision of the ALJ, is supported by substantial evidence. Because the decision of the Appeals Council here was supported by substantial evidence, that decision is affirmed. See Howard v. Heckler, 782 F.2d 1484, 1486-87 (9th Cir. 1986). I adopt the Report and Recommendation (#64) motion for summary judgment (#55) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this /tl • day of May, 2013. OWEN M. PANNER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2 - ORDER Defendants'

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?