Clow v. Grants Pass Public Safety Office et al

Filing 64

ORDER: Adopting Report and Recommendation 53 ; Granting the City of Grants Pass defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 26 ; Denying plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment 34 , 43 . Ordered & Signed on 8/21/12 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (kf)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MEDFORD DIVISION
WILSON L. CLOW JR.,
Case No. 1:12-cv-149-CL
Plaintiff,

v.
GRANTS PASS PUBLIC SAFETY
J. MOORE, et al.,

ORDER

Defendants.

PANNER, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and
Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court.
U.S.C.

§

636(b} (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

See 28

When either party

objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation, the district court makes a de novo determination
of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report.

28 U.S.C.

§

636(b) (I) (C)i McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach.,
656 F. 2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).
1

ORDER

I

,
!

i

1

Here, plaintiff objects to the Report and Recommendation, so

1
,

I have

I

Judge Clar

I
!

~

!

ewed this matter de novo.

!

i
!

I
i
<

with Magistrate

that the defendant police officer had probable cause

to issue the citation to

aintiff.

Report and Recommendation

Accordingly, I ADOPT

Magistrate Judge Clarke.

I

I

I

CONCLUSION
Magistrate Judge Clar
adopted.

's Report and Recommendation (#53) is

The City of Grants Pass defendants' motion for summary

judgment (#26) is granted and plaintiff's motions for summa
judgment (#34, #43) are denied.

i
i

IT IS SO ORDERED.

I

I

DATED

-z.{

is

~ day

August, 2012.

()~)U~~

I

I

OWEN M. PANNER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

2 - ORDER