Clow v. Grants Pass Public Safety Office et al

Filing 78

ORDER: Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendations 69 , 75 are adopted. The motions to dismiss 62 and for limited judgment 73 are granted. Plaintiff's state law claims against Bean are dismissed without prejudice and with leave to refile in state court. Signed on 1/17/2013 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION WILSON L. CLOW JR., Case No. 1:12-cv-149-CL Plaintiff, v. GRANTS PASS PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER J. MOORE, et al., ORDER Defendants. PANNER, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke has filed two-Reports and Recommendations, and they are both now before this court. U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b). See 28 Although no objections have been filed to either Report and Recommendation, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983). As to the first Report and Recommendation (#69), I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that plaintiff failed to state a claim 1 - ORDER under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant Barbara Bean. I also agree that this court should decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims against Bean, so those claims are dismissed without prejudice and with leave to refile in state court. As to the second Report and Recommendation (#75), I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that the Grants Pass defendants are entitled to a judgment of dismissal. Because remaining defendant, is also being dismissed, ~Bean, the only I will issue a judgment covering the entire action. Accordingly, I adopt the Reports and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Clarke. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Ci v. P. 7 2 (b) . CONCLUSION Magistrate Judge Clarke's Reports and Recommendations #75) are adopted. The motions to dismiss judgment (#73) are granted. (#69, (#62) and for limited Plaintiff's state law claims against Bean are dismissed without prejudice and with leave to refile in state court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this ~day of January, 2013. OWEN M. PANNER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?