Godwin v. Rogue Valley Youth Correctional Facility et al

Filing 69

ORDER: Adopting Report and Recommendation 62 ; Granting Plaintiff's due process and equal protection claims, and Denying Plaintiff's First Amendment Retaliation claim on Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 28 . Signed on 7/12/2013 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON RONALD GODWIN, 1:12-cv-00478-CL Plaintiff, ORDER v. ,ROGUE VALLEY YOUTH CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (RVYCF), KEN JERIN, Superintendent, OREGON YOUTH AUTHORITY, COLLETTE PETER, Director, JEAN STRAIGHT, an individual employed by the OYA, CITY OF GRANTS PASS, JOHN and JANE DOE Defendants. PANNER, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), .Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). objections have been filed, 1 - ORDER Although no this court reviews the legal See 28 principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983). I have given this matter de novo review. Accordingly, I find no error. I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation (#62). Defendants' motion to for judgment on t·he pleadings is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's due process and equal protection claims, and DENIED as to Plaintiff's First Amendment Retaliation claim. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this '/'),/d.ay of July, 2013. OWEN M. PANNER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?