United States of America v. Cermak et al

Filing 66

ORDER: Denying Motion to Intervene 42 ; Adopting Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation 56 . Signed on 10/31/2012 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,

1:12-CV-603-CL

v.

ORDER

IVAN A. CERMAK, et al.,
Defendants.

PANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and
Recommendation [#56], and the matter is now before this court.
See 28 U.S.C.

§

636(b) (1) (B),

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Acting pro

se, Eric Lighter filed objections to the report.

Accordingly, I

have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C.

§

636 (b) (1) (c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach.,
Inc.,

656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).

conclude the report is correct.
1 - OPINION AND ORDER

I find no error and

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation [#56] is
adopted.

Eric Lighter's motion to intervene [#42] is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this

?/

day of October, 2012.

OWEN M. PANNER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

2 - ORDER