United States of America v. Cermak et al

Filing 85

ORDER: Adopting Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation 83 ; Granting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 74 Signed on 10/17/2013 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj) Modified on 10/17/2013 to correct typo (dkj).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1:12-cv-00603-CL Plaintiff, ORDER v. IVAN A. CERMAK; JOAN E. CERMAK; et al Defendants. PANNER, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Rep6rt and Recommendation (#83), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b) (1) (B), objections have been filed, principles de novo. 1 - ORDER Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no this court reviews the legal See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983). I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation (#83). The Government's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this /7 day of October, 2013. OWEN M. PANNER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?