Flores v. Murphy Company

Filing 51

ORDER: Denying Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 10 ); Adopting Findings and Recommendation 25 . Signed on 2/12/2014 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
MEDFORD DIVISION
THOMAS FLORES,
1:12-cv-2156-CL
Plaintiffs,
ORDER

v.

MURPHY COMPANY, and Oregon
business corporation, dba
MURPHY VENEER,
·Defendant.

PANNER, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and
Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court.
U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B),

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

objectioris have been filed,
principles de novo.
1 - ORDER

See 28

Although no

this court reviews the legal

See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d

1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).
I have given this matter de novo review.

I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT the Findings and Recommendation (#25).
Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (#10) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this

/~day of February,

2014.

OWEN M. PANNER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

2 - ORDER