Flores v. Murphy Company

Filing 82

ORDER: In re: final Pretrial Conference 81 . Ordered and Signed on 04/02/2014 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (rsm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
MEDFORD DIVISION
THOMAS FLORES,
1:12-cv-2156-CL
Plaintiffs,
v.

ORDER

MURPHY COMPANY, and Oregon
business corporation, dba
MURPHY VENEER,
Defendant.

PANNER, District Judge:

On April 1, 2014, the parties held the final pretrial
conference in this matter (#81).

Plaintiff is to provide proposed

stipulated facts to Defendant for approval by April 3, 2014.
trial is to commence on April 10, 2014 at 9:00 am:
1 - ORDER

Jury

I. Plaintiff's Objections to Exhibits
Plaintiff made oral objections to Defendant's Amended Exhibit
List

(#75).

I

rule on those objections as follows:

Plaintiff's objections to Defendant's Exhibit 103 are
sustained at this time, pending submission of Plaintiff's proposed
stipulations.
Plaintiff's objections to Defendant's Exhibit 108 are
overruled.
Plaintiff's objections are Defendant's Exhibits 112, 113,
114, and 115 are sustained pursuant to my previous rulings on the
motions in limine.
Plaintiff's objections as to Defendant's Exhibit 116 are
sustained at this time.

The Court will consider arguments as to

the exhibit's admissibility on the question of damages at the
appropriate time.
All other exhibits are received without objection.
II. Objections as to Witness Statements
Plaintiff's objections as to the timing of witness disclosure
is overruled.
Eric Fox, Dan Penland, Jesus Murillo and David Avery will be
, permitted to testify, subject to the limitations outlined in my
previous rulings on the motions in limine.
be permitted to testify.

Adrienne Auxier will

The parties concede that testimony of

John Murphy, Jr. will not be necessary, pending appropriate
stipulations.
The Court will rule on all other objections at the time of
trial.
2

- ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this

~ay of April, 2014.

---

~~~
OWEN M. PANNER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

· 3 - ORDER