Cervenan v. Thermal Supply, Inc

Filing 35

ORDER: Denying Motion for Summary Judgment 13 and Adopting Findings and Recommendation 25 . Signed on 6/13/2014 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (wk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION PAUL S. CERVENAN, 1:13-cv-00498-CL Plaintiff, v. ORDER THERMAL SUPPLY, INC., Defendant. PANNER, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (#25), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b). Defendant Thermal Supply filed objections (#31) and I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1 - ORDER 1981). I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation (#25). Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (#13) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this /'3 day of June, 2014. OWEN M. PANNER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?