Kessler et al v. Oregon Department of Child Welfare et al

Filing 36

ORDER: Adopting the Findings and Recommendation 32 . Plaintiffs' motion 14 and request for Judicial notice 31 are DENIED. Defendants' motion to dismiss 22 is GRANTED. Signed on 10/30/2013 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION RANDY KESSLER; BRENDA KESSLER, 1:13-cv-01023-CL Plaintiffs, ORDER v. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CHILD WELFARE; JOSH MILLER; JENNIFER ,MILLER, Defendants. PANNER, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court.- U.S.C. ยง 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. objections have been filed, principles de novo. 1 - ORDER P. 72(b). See 28 Although no this court reviews the legal See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983). I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Findings and Recommendation (#32). Plaintiffs' motion (#14) and request for judicial notice (#31) are DENIED. Defendants' motion to dismiss (#22) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this ~day of October, 2013. OWEN M. PANNER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?