McKenzie v. Jorizzo et al

Filing 24

ORDER: Defendant Medical Eye Center's motion to dismiss for improper venue 19 is DENIED. In the event this case proceeds to trial, Defendant may move the court to transfer this matter to Medford for trial. LR 3-3(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 2/3/2014 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (gw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON GUSTAVO McKENZIE, Plaintiff, 1:13-cv-01302-HU ORDER v. PAUL A. JORIZZO, M.D., et al., Defendants. Mosman, Judge Plaintiff, an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. In the caption of his original and amended complaints, plaintiff incorrectly identifies Portland as the division where "divisional venue" lies. See LR 3-2(b) ("'divisional venue' means the division of the court in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred"). Defendant Medical Eye Center-Medford moves to dismiss this action on the basis that "divisional venue" lies in Medford. Pursuant to this Court's case management plan, prisoner civil rights cases are assigned on a district-wide basis (rather than by 1 - ORDER division). Consequently, although the Clerk of the Court assigned this case a Medford division code, the case was randomly assigned to a Portland judge. Accordingly, Defendant Medical Eye Center's motion to dismiss for improper venue (#19) is DENIED. In the event this case proceeds to trial, Defendant may move the court to transfer this matter to Medford for trial. LR 3-3(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 3rd day of February, 2014. /s/ Michael W. Mosman Michael W. Mosman United States District Judge 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?