McKenzie v. Jorizzo et al
Filing
24
ORDER: Defendant Medical Eye Center's motion to dismiss for improper venue 19 is DENIED. In the event this case proceeds to trial, Defendant may move the court to transfer this matter to Medford for trial. LR 3-3(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 2/3/2014 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (gw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
GUSTAVO McKENZIE,
Plaintiff,
1:13-cv-01302-HU
ORDER
v.
PAUL A. JORIZZO, M.D., et al.,
Defendants.
Mosman, Judge
Plaintiff, an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison, brings this
civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983.
In the caption
of his original and amended complaints, plaintiff incorrectly
identifies Portland as the division where "divisional venue" lies.
See LR 3-2(b) ("'divisional venue' means the division of the court
in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise
to the claim occurred"). Defendant Medical Eye Center-Medford moves
to dismiss this action on the basis that "divisional venue" lies in
Medford.
Pursuant to this Court's case management plan, prisoner civil
rights cases are assigned on a district-wide basis (rather than by
1 - ORDER
division).
Consequently, although the Clerk of the Court assigned
this case a Medford division code, the case was randomly assigned
to a Portland judge.
Accordingly, Defendant Medical Eye Center's
motion to dismiss for improper venue (#19) is DENIED.
In the event
this case proceeds to trial, Defendant may move the court to
transfer this matter to Medford for trial.
LR 3-3(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
3rd
day of February, 2014.
/s/ Michael W. Mosman
Michael W. Mosman
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?