Gonzales et al v. Schutt
Filing
23
ORDER: Denying 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Granting Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint/Petition 11 ; Adopting Findings and Recommendation 16 . Signed on 1/27/2015 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (jkm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
MEDFORD DIVISION
ORLANDO GONZALES; BONNIE
JEAN GONZALES,
1:14-cv-01347-CL
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER
DAVID SCHUTT,
Defendant.
PANNER, District
On
Decemb~r
Ju~ge:
12, 2014, Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a
Findings and Recommendation (#16), and the matter is now before
this Court.
See 28 U.S.C.
Defendant filed objections
§
636(b)(l)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
(#21),
Plaintiffs have responded to
Defendant's objections (#22) and I have reviewed the file of this
case de novo. 28 U.S.C.
§
636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Doualas Corp. v.
1 - ORDER
I
Commodore Bus. Mach.,
Inc.,
656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).
I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error.
There are insufficient facts for the Court to make a determination
regarding prosecutorial immunity and sovereign immunity at this
stage of the case.
Recommendation.
Accordingly,
I ADOPr the Findings and
Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#7)
Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend the Complaint (#11)
is DENIED.
is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
,%... '1
day of January, 2 014.
~~~~~
OWEN M. PANNER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?