Mayes et al v. The State of Oregon et al

Filing 43

ORDER: Denied as Moot Motion to Set Aside ( 26 ) Findings & Recommendation: Amended Complaint 23 , Motion to Set Aside Order on motion/application for leave to proceed ifp, 18 26 should be DENIED 40 ; Adopting Findings and Recommendation 40 . I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. Signed on 4/28/2015 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (jkm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
MEDFORD DIVISION
MICHAEL L. MAYES;
JONATHAN D.M. MAYES,
1:14-cv-02042-CL
Plaintiffs,

v.

ORDER

STEVEN D. CAMPBELL, et al.,
Defendants.

PANNER, District Judge:

On April 7, 2015, Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a
Findings and Recommendation (#40), and the matter is now before
this Court.

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

Plaintiffs have filed Objections (#42) and I have reviewed the
file of this case de novo. 28 U.S. C.

§

636 (b) ( 1) (C); McDonnell

Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313
1 - ORDER

(9th Cir. 1981).
I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error.
This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

All pending motions are

DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this

~ day of April, 2015.

OWEN M. PANNER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

2 - ORDER