Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians
Filing
11
ORDER: Finding as Moot Motion to Intervene 6 . My previously issued Order of September 17, 2014 (#4) shall be amended as follows: Intervenor Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon shall be permitted to participate in the deposition of Dr. Stephen Dow Beckham and shall be permitted to cross-examine the witness. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 1/8/2015 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (jkm) Modified on 1/8/2015 (jkm). To reflect opinion.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
MEDFORD DIVISION
COW CREEK BANK OF UMPQUA
TRIBE OF INDIANS,
Civ. No. 1:14-cv-00324-PA
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF
SILETZ INDIANS OF OREGON,
Intervenor.
PANNER,
Distri.ct Judge:
This matter comes before the Court on Intervenor Confederated
Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon's Motion to Intervene in the
perpetuated
depos~tion
testimony of Dr. Stephen Dow Beckham (#4).
Background
On August 18, 2014, Petitioner Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe
of Indians filed a petition to take the deposition of Dr. Stephen
1. - ORDER
Dow Beckham in order to perpetuate his testimony in anticipation of
a
civil
action
involves
an
in
federal
application
court
for
(#1).
the
The
anticipated action
United
States
to
accept
approximately 2.4 acres of land in Medford, _Oregon, to be held in
trust for the Coquille Tribe for gambling purposes.
Dr. Beckham is a noted expert on the history of Southwestern
Oregon Tribes.
Petitioner seeks to use Dr. Beckham's testimony to
establish that the Coquille Tribe lacks sufficient aboriginal or
historical connection to the disputed property.
Dr. Beckham is 73
years old and apparently in poor health and Petitioner is uncertain
that Dr.
Beckham will be available when the controversy becomes
ripe for litigation.
On September 17, 2014, I granted the petition
( #4) .
·Discussion
This
is
a
very
unusual
case.
Rule
27
requires
that
the
petitioner serve .each expected adverse party with a copy of the
petition and a notice stating the time and place of the hearing.
Fed.
R.
Ci v.
P. . 2 7 ( 2) .
Intervenor
claims
an
interest
in
the
anticipated litigation adverse to Petitioner, but affirm that they
were not served with notice of the perpetuation testimony of Dr.
Beckham by Petitioner.
Intervenor seeks to participate in the deposition via a motion
brought under Rule 24.
Under Rule 24, the court must permit anyone
to intervene who "claims an interest relating to the property or
transaction that is the subject of the action, and is so situated
that disposing of the action may as a practical matter impair or
2 - ORDER
impede
the
movant's
ability
to
protect
its
interest,
existing parties adequately represent that interest."
unless
Fed. R. Civ.
P. 24 (a) (2).
Petitioner opposes Intervenor's motion on the basis that no
action is pending before the Court and that this Court therefore
lacks
jurisdiction to grant the motion.
concede
that
Petitioner's
position
is
Intervenor appears to
technically correct,
but
argues that it should be allowed to participate in the deposition
in the interests of justice.
I conclude, however, that it is not
necessary to resolve this issue on the basis of Intervenor's Motion
under Rule 24.
District courts are granted wide discretion in crafting orders
to perpetuate
testimony under
Fed.
R'.
Civ.
P.
27.
Martin v.
Reynolds Metals Corp:, 297 F.2d 49, 57 (9th Cir. 1961)
The Court
is similarly empowered, upon a proper showing, to make changes in
a
previously
entered
order
protection of adverse parties.
perpetuating
testimony
for
the
Id.
I am satisfied, based on the record, that Intervenor has made
a sufficient showing that it is an adverse party to Petitioner and
that its interests will not be adequately represented by any of the
parties already served pursuant to Rule 27.
I
conclude that my
previously issued Order (#4) should be amended to permit Intervenor
to participate jn the deposition of Dr. Stephen Beckham.
Such an
amendment
in
wili
serve
to
protect
Intervenor's
interest
the
anticipated litigation, thereby rendering the Motion to Intervene·
(#6) MOOT.
3 - ORDER
Conclusion
My previously issued Order of September 17, 2014 (#4) shall be
amended as follows:
Intervenor Confederated Tribes of Siletz
Indians of Oregon
shall be permitted to participate in the deposition of Dr. Stephen
Dow Beckham and shall be permitted to cross-examine the witness.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
day ~anuary, 201~
~21{
OWEN M. PANNER ·
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
4
- ORDER
~ /
~
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?