Moen v. State of Oregon et al

Filing 9

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 6 . Plaintiff's Complaint 1 is DISMISSED and Plaintiff's application to proceed IFP 2 is DENIED as moot and Plaintiff's motion for pro bono counsel 3 is DENIED. Plaintiff is given thirty days to file an optional amended complaint. See formal ORDER. Copy of ORDER sent to Pro Se Plaintiff. Signed on 4/17/2015 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (rh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JODIE MOEN,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:15 CV 00380-CL

v.
ORDER
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
OREGON, KLAMATH COUNTY,
Defendant.

Magistrate Judge Clarke filed his Findings and Recommendation on March 26, 2015.
The matter is now before me.· See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No
objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual
findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir.
1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Clarke's Findings and
Recommendation.
Dated this

Lf-

day of April, 2015.

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge

Order -- Page 1