Flores v. United States Attorney General et al

Filing 6

OPINION AND ORDER: Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation 4 is adopted in full. Plaintiffs motion to transfer to multidistrict litigation 1 is DENIED, and plaintiffs application for leave to proceed IFP 2 , is DENIED. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
ERIC FLORES,

Plaintiff,

Civ. No. 1:15-cv-00644-CL
OPINION AND ORDER

V.

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
GENERAL and FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION,

Defendants.

MCSHANE, Judge:

Plaintiff, pro se, seeks to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this action alleging that an
"organized group of executive employees of the federal government" used "advanced technology
with a direct signal to a satellite in outerspace [sic]" to violate his rights under the First
Amendment. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke issued a Report and Recommendation on April
24, 2015, in which he recommended that this Court dismiss plaintiffs complaint as frivolous.
The matter is now before this Court. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
Because no objections to the Report and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court
reviews only the legal principles de novo. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,
1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en bane); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444--45
(9th Cir. 1988) (citations omitted). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, this Court finds
no error in Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation, ECF No.4.

1 -OPINION AND ORDER

CONCLUSION

This Court ADOPTS Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation, ECF No.4, in full.
Accordingly, plaintiffs motion to transfer to multidistrict litigation, ECF No. 1-3, is DENIED,
and plaintiffs application for leave to proceed IFP, ECF No.2, is DENIED

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 12th day of May, 2015.

L

~L--

Michael J. McShane
United States District Judge

2 - OPINION AND ORDER