Wilson v. Decibels of Oregon, Inc. et al

Filing 102

ORDER: Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation 97 is adopted. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 72 is granted in part and denied in part; Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 76 is denied. Signed on 10/24/2017 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
MATTHEW WILSON,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:16-cv-00855-CL
v.
ORDER
DECIBELS OF OREGON, INC., and
DENNIS SNYDER,
Defendants.
_____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge:
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (ECF
No. 97), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b). Plaintiff filed objections to the R&R’s recommendation to deny Plaintiff’s summary
judgment motion and to grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ summary judgment motion.
ECF No. 99. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313
(9th Cir. 1981). I conclude the report is correct and adopt. It correctly identifies and details the
questions of fact which precludes a court from granting a summary judgment motion.
Plaintiff’s summary judgment motion (ECF No. 76) is DENIED and Defendants’
summary judgment motion (ECF No. 72) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 24th day of October, 2017.
_____/s/ Michael J. McShane_____
Michael J. McShane
United States District Judge
1 – ORDER